Can a trust pay for tech used to track treatment adherence?

The question of whether a trust can pay for technology used to track treatment adherence is increasingly common as healthcare evolves and incorporates more digital tools. The short answer is generally yes, but with important considerations. Trusts, whether revocable or irrevocable, are designed to provide for the beneficiary’s well-being, and that well-being increasingly includes managing and monitoring health conditions. Ted Cook, a San Diego trust attorney, emphasizes that the key lies in the trust document’s language and how the expenses align with the stated purpose of the trust. Roughly 65% of Americans report difficulty adhering to long-term medication regimens, highlighting the need for such tools. This makes proactive monitoring a legitimate expense, provided it’s properly documented and falls within the bounds of what the trust is intended to cover.

What qualifies as a “healthcare expense” for trust distribution?

Determining what constitutes a valid “healthcare expense” is crucial. Traditionally, this included doctor visits, hospital stays, and medications. Now, it expands to encompass technologies that directly support medical treatment and improve health outcomes. This can include wearable devices that monitor vital signs, remote patient monitoring systems, and apps designed to remind patients to take medication or track symptoms. However, the IRS requires careful documentation to demonstrate the medical necessity of these expenses. A detailed explanation from a physician stating how the technology aids in treatment and improves adherence is vital. Ted Cook notes that proactive documentation is essential, especially with emerging technologies where IRS guidelines may not be explicitly defined.

Can an irrevocable trust cover these expenses without triggering tax implications?

Irrevocable trusts present a unique set of challenges because, once established, their terms are difficult to modify. Paying for treatment adherence technology from an irrevocable trust is permissible if the trust document allows for healthcare expenses. However, the distribution must be used solely for the beneficiary’s benefit and aligned with the trust’s purpose. Distributions for anything beyond that could be considered a taxable event. Ted Cook frequently advises clients to review the trust document with a qualified tax professional before making distributions for newer technologies to ensure compliance. According to a recent study, approximately 30% of trust distributions are initially flagged for further review due to incomplete documentation.

What documentation is needed to justify these expenses to the IRS?

Meticulous documentation is paramount when seeking reimbursement for treatment adherence technology from a trust. This includes a doctor’s order or prescription specifically recommending the technology, a detailed invoice outlining the cost, and a clear explanation of how the technology supports the beneficiary’s treatment plan. It’s not enough to simply state the technology helps with adherence; the documentation should outline the specific data collected and how it is used by the healthcare provider. “The IRS is increasingly scrutinizing trust distributions, especially for non-traditional healthcare expenses,” explains Ted Cook. “Having a robust paper trail is crucial for avoiding potential issues.”

What if the beneficiary is resistant to using the technology?

A common challenge arises when the beneficiary is hesitant to embrace technology. A trust can’t force someone to utilize a device, but it can stipulate conditions for receiving distributions. For example, a trust could state that continued financial support for healthcare is contingent upon the beneficiary’s willingness to participate in a treatment plan that includes adherence monitoring. This requires a delicate balance between providing support and respecting the beneficiary’s autonomy. Ted Cook often suggests a collaborative approach, involving the beneficiary, their healthcare provider, and a trusted family member to address concerns and emphasize the benefits of the technology.

I remember Mrs. Gable, a fiercely independent woman who established a trust for her mother, Eleanor, who struggled with Alzheimer’s. Eleanor’s trust funded in-home care and medical expenses. Mrs. Gable, believing a smart watch that tracked Eleanor’s wandering and reminded her to take medication would be beneficial, purchased one without first clarifying it with the trustee or her mother. Eleanor, deeply offended by the “spy device,” refused to wear it, and the purchase became a source of tension. The funds were allocated, but the intended benefit—improved adherence and safety—never materialized. It was a clear lesson that even well-intentioned purchases must align with the beneficiary’s needs and preferences, and that communication is key.

How can a trust be structured to proactively address future healthcare technology needs?

Forward-thinking trust drafting can anticipate the evolving landscape of healthcare technology. This could involve including language that broadly permits the trustee to fund expenses related to “innovative healthcare solutions” or “technologies that improve health management.” However, it’s crucial to strike a balance between broad discretion and clear guidelines to prevent misuse of funds. Ted Cook recommends incorporating a provision that requires the trustee to consult with a healthcare professional before approving expenses for new technologies. He also advises establishing a process for periodically reviewing the trust document to ensure it remains relevant in light of technological advancements.

I also recall Mr. Chen, who meticulously crafted his mother’s trust. Aware of her declining vision and a family history of medication non-adherence, he included a specific provision allowing the trustee to fund “smart pill dispensers” and “remote medication monitoring systems.” When his mother’s doctor recommended a wearable sensor that tracked her activity levels and vital signs, the trustee initially hesitated, unsure if it fell within the scope of the trust. However, because Mr. Chen had anticipated the need for adaptable technology, the trustee was able to confidently approve the purchase, knowing it aligned with the overall goal of supporting his mother’s health and well-being. It was a testament to the power of proactive planning.

What are the potential pitfalls to avoid when using trust funds for these technologies?

Several potential pitfalls need careful consideration. First, ensure the technology is legitimately medically necessary and supported by a healthcare professional. Second, avoid purchasing excessively expensive or unproven technologies. Third, maintain meticulous documentation of all expenses and justifications. Fourth, be mindful of the beneficiary’s preferences and concerns. Finally, regularly review the trust document and consult with a qualified attorney and tax professional to ensure compliance. Ted Cook emphasizes that “proactive planning and diligent documentation are the keys to successfully utilizing trust funds for emerging healthcare technologies.” Ultimately, the goal is to ensure the trust effectively supports the beneficiary’s health and well-being while minimizing potential legal and tax complications.


Who Is Ted Cook at Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.:

Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.

2305 Historic Decatur Rd Suite 100, San Diego CA. 92106

(619) 550-7437

Map To Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC, a trust lawyer near me: https://maps.app.goo.gl/JiHkjNg9VFGA44tf9


src=”https://www.google.com/maps/embed?pb=!1m18!1m12!1m3!1d3356.1864302092154!2d-117.21647!3d32.73424!2m3!1f0!2f0!3f0!3m2!1i1024!2i768!4f13.1!3m3!1m2!1s0x80deab61950cce75%3A0x54cc35a8177a6d51!2sPoint%20Loma%20Estate%20Planning%2C%20APC!5e0!3m2!1sen!2sus!4v1744077614644!5m2!1sen!2sus” width=”100%” height=”350″ style=”border:0;” allowfullscreen=”” loading=”lazy” referrerpolicy=”no-referrer-when-downgrade”>

probate attorney in San Diego
probate lawyer in San Diego
estate planning attorney in San Diego
estate planning lawyer in San Diego

About Point Loma Estate Planning:



Secure Your Legacy, Safeguard Your Loved Ones. Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.

Feeling overwhelmed by estate planning? You’re not alone. With 27 years of proven experience – crafting over 25,000 personalized plans and trusts – we transform complexity into clarity.

Our Areas of Focus:

Legacy Protection: (minimizing taxes, maximizing asset preservation).

Crafting Living Trusts: (administration and litigation).

Elder Care & Tax Strategy: Avoid family discord and costly errors.

Discover peace of mind with our compassionate guidance.

Claim your exclusive 30-minute consultation today!


If you have any questions about: What happens to a disabled person’s benefits if they inherit money directly? Please Call or visit the address above. Thank you.